Seismicity of the Noto Peninsula: Spatial Patterns, Shallow Seismic Zones, and Possible Volcano-Related Signals
 
More details
Hide details
1
Graduate School of Bioresource Sciences, Akita Prefectural University, Akita 010-0195, Japan
 
 
Submission date: 2026-03-02
 
 
Acceptance date: 2026-03-30
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-04-23
 
 
Publication date: 2026-06-30
 
 
Corresponding author
Tomokazu Konishi   

konishi@akita-pu.ac.jp
 
 
Trends in Ecological and Indoor Environmental Engineering, 2026;4(2):22-34
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Japan's complex tectonic setting produces intense seismicity, yet reliable earthquake prediction remains unresolved. Recent data-driven approaches suggest that classical models may be insufficient, highlighting the value of exploratory analysis of seismic parameters. The Noto Peninsula, despite its distance from major plate boundaries, exhibits persistent shallow seismicity and recent large events, making it a critical region for investigating potential precursory signals and improving forecasting methods.

Objectives:
This study aims to identify seismic anomalies in the Noto Peninsula that may act as precursors to large earthquakes, and to evaluate whether persistent elevation of the magnitude locator provides a more reliable forecasting indicator than scale variations.

Methods:
Earthquake data from the Japan Meteorological Agency catalogue (2007–2026) were analysed using an exploratory data analysis framework. Magnitudes were modelled as normally distributed, with location (μ) and scale (σ) parameters estimated via maximum likelihood. Spatial patterns were examined using a 1° latitude–longitude grid, with monthly aggregation of raw event counts and no smoothing applied. All recorded events, including low-magnitude earthquakes, were retained despite known detection limits. Statistical tools included Q–Q plots, regression, and distribution fitting to identify anomalies. Analyses were conducted in R, with full code publicly available to ensure reproducibility and transparency of the methodology.

Results:
Aftershock decay following the May 2023 earthquake showed two distinct phases inconsistent with classical Omori-type behaviour, while magnitude parameters exhibited atypical patterns, including a delayed and persistent increase in the locator. Spatial analysis revealed increasing seismicity near the Noto Peninsula since 2020, culminating in the January 2024 M7.6 event and rapid offshore propagation. Seismicity remained predominantly shallow, indicating stress accumulation in a near-surface zone rather than along the main plate boundary. Offshore regions displayed high locator and low scale values, resembling volcanic-type seismicity. Additional evidence suggests the presence of shallow seismic bands and possible structural links between Noto and adjacent regions. Post-2024 activity shows partial stabilization but continued complexity.

Conclusion:
Seismic activity in the Noto Peninsula exhibits distinct spatial and temporal patterns, with locator variations providing useful indicators of large events. Offshore anomalies and shallow seismic zones suggest complex tectonic or volcanic influences, highlighting the need for continued monitoring and data-driven forecasting approaches.
REFERENCES (60)
1.
Adhikari, L. B., Gautam, U. P., Koirala, B. P., Bhattarai, M., Kandel, T., Gupta, R. M., ... & Bollinger, L. (2015). The aftershock sequence of the 2015 April 25 Gorkha–Nepal earthquake. Geophysical Supplements to the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 203(3), 2119–2124. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/gg....
 
2.
Asano, K., & Iwata, T. (2025). Source rupture process of the MW 6.2 earthquake in the Noto Peninsula, central Japan, on May 5, 2023. Earth, Planets and Space, 77(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623....
 
3.
Bird, P. (2003). An updated digital model of plate boundaries. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 4(3), 1027. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GC....
 
4.
Console, R., & Mele, G. (2026). Historical Perspective and Critical Review of the Seismic Swarm Concept. Annals of Geophysics, 69(1), S110–S110. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-948....
 
5.
Du, M., Lei, J., & Zhao, D. (2023). New seismic constraints on arc magmatism and subduction dynamics beneath the Japan Islands from Sn tomography. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 256, 105802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsea....
 
6.
Evison, F. F., & Rhoades, D. A. (1998). Long-term seismogenic process for major earthquakes in subduction zones. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 108(3), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-....
 
7.
Fujiwara, K. (2024). Coastal uplift and topographic changes caused by the Noto Peninsula earthquake. https://rebootsuzu.com/noto/20....
 
8.
Gamage, S. S., Umino, N., Hasegawa, A., & Kirby, S. H. (2009). Offshore double-planed shallow seismic zone in the NE Japan forearc region revealed by sP depth phases recorded by regional networks. Geophysical Journal International, 178(1), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365....
 
9.
Geffers, G. M., Main, I. G., & Naylor, M. (2023). Accuracy and precision of frequency–size distribution scaling parameters as a function of dynamic range of observations: example of the Gutenberg–Richter law b-value for earthquakes. Geophysical Journal International, 232(3), 2080–2086. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/gg....
 
10.
Geological Survey of Japan. (2010). Seamless geoinformation of coastal zone: Northern coastal zone of Noto Peninsula. https://www.gsj.jp/researches/....
 
11.
Geospatial Information Authority of Japan (GSI). (2025). Standard map. https://maps.gsi.go.jp/.
 
12.
Hiramatsu, Y., Shelly, D. R., Nishimura, T., Nakajima, J., Sekiguchi, H., Morishita, T., ... & Kato, A. (2026). Special issue “The 2024 M7. 6 Noto Peninsula Earthquake and Seismic Swarm”. Earth, Planets and Space, 78(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623....
 
13.
Hirano, S. I., Nakata, T., & Imaizumi, T. (1979). Crustal deformation associated with the Kisakata earthquake of 1804 on the Japan Sea coast, Northeast Japan. The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu), 18(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.4116/jaqua.....
 
14.
Honda, R., Aoi, S., & Matsubara, M. (2025). Characteristics of the source process of the 2024 M7. 6 Noto Peninsula earthquake revealed from back-projection analysis in both low-and high-frequency bands. Earth, Planets and Space, 77(1), 149. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623....
 
15.
Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA). (2023). How earthquakes occur. https://www.data.jma.go.jp/svd....
 
16.
Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA). (2024b). Related information on the 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake. https://www.jma.go.jp/jma/menu....
 
17.
Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA). (2024а). About earthquake prediction. https://www.jma.go.jp/jma/kish....
 
18.
Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA). (2025a). Summary of seismic activity for each month. https://www.data.jma.go.jp/eqe....
 
19.
Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA). (2025b). Earthquake Monthly Report (Catalog Edition). https://www.data.jma.go.jp/eqe....
 
20.
Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA). (2025c). List of epicenter location. https://www.data.jma.go.jp/eqe....
 
21.
Kato, A., & Ben-Zion, Y. (2021). The generation of large earthquakes. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017....
 
22.
Kato, A., & Nakagawa, S. (2014). Multiple slow‐slip events during a foreshock sequence of the 2014 Iquique, Chile Mw 8.1 earthquake. Geophysical Research Letters, 41(15), 5420–5427. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL....
 
23.
Konishi, T. (2025a). Seismic pattern changes before the 2011 Tohoku earthquake revealed by exploratory data analysis. Interpretation, 13(4), T725–T735. https://doi.org/10.1190/INT-20....
 
24.
Konishi, T. (2025b). Exploratory Statistical Analysis of Precursors to Moderate Earthquakes in Japan. GeoHazards, 6(4), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohaz....
 
25.
Konishi, T. (2025c). Identifying Seismic Anomalies through Latitude-Longitude Mesh Analysis. https://www.preprints.org/manu....
 
26.
Konishi, T. (2025d). Earthquake Swarm Activity in the Tokara Islands (2025): Statistical Analysis Indicates Low Probability of Major Seismic Event. GeoHazards, 6(3), 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/geohaz....
 
27.
Konishi, T. (2025e). Tutorial Review: Exploratory Data Analysis with R as a Novel Framework for Seismic Data Interpretation. Sci 2026, 8, 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/sci804....
 
28.
Konishi, T. (2026). Visualising Earthquakes: Plate Boundaries and Seismic Decay. Trends in Ecological and Indoor Environmental Engineering, 4(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.62622/TEIEE....
 
29.
Kostoglou, A., Orlecka-Sikora, B., Lasocki, S., & Tong, F. (2025). The Gutenberg–Richter Relation May Not Hold for the Anthropogenic Seismicity: A. Kostoglou et al. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 182(8), 3067–3089. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024....
 
30.
Krushelnitskii, K. V., Shebalin, P. N., Vorobieva, I. A., Selyutskaya, O. V., & Antipova, A. O. (2024). The limits of applicability of the Gutenberg–Richter law in the problems of seismic hazard and risk assessment. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, 60(5), 823–835. https://doi.org/10.1134/S10693....
 
31.
Liu, C., Bai, Y., Lay, T., He, P., Wen, Y., Wei, X., ... & Xiong, X. (2024). Shallow crustal rupture in a major MW 7.5 earthquake above a deep crustal seismic swarm along the Noto Peninsula in western Japan. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 648, 119107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl....
 
32.
Lolli, B., & Gasperini, P. (2006). Comparing different models of aftershock rate decay: The role of catalog incompleteness in the first times after main shock. Tectonophysics, 423(1–4), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tect....
 
33.
Lolli, B., Gasperini, P., & Boschi, E. (2011). Time variations of aftershock decay parameters of the 2009 April 6 L'Aquila (central Italy) earthquake: evidence of the emergence of a negative exponential regime superimposed to the power law. Geophysical Journal International, 185(2), 764–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365....
 
34.
Malyshev, Y. F., Podgornyi, V. Y., Shevchenko, B. F., Romanovskii, N. P., Kaplun, V. B., & Gornov, P. Y. (2007). Deep structure of the Amur lithospheric plate border zone. Russian Journal of Pacific Geology, 1(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1134/S18197....
 
35.
Mitsui, Y. (2024). Stable estimation of the Gutenberg–Richter b-values by the b-positive method: a case study of aftershock zones for magnitude-7 class earthquakes. Earth, Planets and Space, 76(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623....
 
36.
Nakajima, J. (2022). Crustal structure beneath earthquake swarm in the Noto peninsula, Japan. Earth, Planets and Space, 74(1), 160. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623....
 
37.
Nanjo, K. Z., Yukutake, Y., & Kumazawa, T. (2025). Changes in seismicity in a volcanically active region of the Izu Peninsula, Japan. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 465, 108355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvol....
 
38.
National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience. (2025). J-SHIS Japan Seismic Hazard Information. https://www.j-shis.bosai.go.jp....
 
39.
Nishimura, T. (2026). Cutoff depths of shallow earthquakes beneath the active volcanoes in Japan and their implication for heat source of magma reservoirs. Earth Planets Space, 78, 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623....
 
40.
NIST/SEMATECH. (2012). e-Handbook of statistical methods. http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898....
 
41.
Okada, T., Umino, N., Hasegawa, A., & Group for the aftershock observations of the Iwate-Miyagi Nairiku Earthquake in 2008. (2012). Hypocenter distribution and heterogeneous seismic velocity structure in and around the focal area of the 2008 Iwate-Miyagi Nairiku Earthquake, NE Japan—possible seismological evidence for a fluid driven compressional inversion earthquake. Earth, Planets and Space, 64(9), 717–728. https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.20....
 
42.
Okuda, S., Ouchi, T., & Terashima, T. (1992). Deviation of magnitude frequency distribution of earthquakes from the Gutenberg-Richter law: detection of precursory anomalies prior to large earthquakes. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 73(3-4), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9....
 
43.
Olsson, R. (1993). Is there any evidence of normal distributions of eq. magnitudes?. Journal of Geodynamics, 17(4), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-3....
 
44.
Omori, F. (1894). On the after-shocks of earthquakes. The Journal of the College of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo, Japan, 7, 111–200. https://repository.dl.itc.u-to....
 
45.
Petrillo, G., Kumazawa, T., Napolitano, F., Capuano, P., & Zhuang, J. (2024). Fluids‐triggered swarm sequence supported by a nonstationary epidemic‐like description of seismicity. Seismological Research Letters, 95(6), 3207–3220. https://doi.org/10.1785/022024....
 
46.
Pollitz, F. F., Kobayashi, T., Yarai, H., Shibazaki, B., & Matsumoto, T. (2017). Viscoelastic lower crust and mantle relaxation following the 14–16 April 2016 Kumamoto, Japan, earthquake sequence. Geophysical Research Letters, 44(17), 8795–8803. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL....
 
47.
R Core Team. (2025). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
 
48.
Serra, I., & Corral, Á. (2017). Deviation from power law of the global seismic moment distribution. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 40045. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40....
 
49.
Shiina, T., Horikawa, H., Sawaki, Y., Sagae, K., & Imanishi, K. (2025). Aftershock distribution of the 2024 Noto Peninsula Earthquake, Japan, determined using a 3D velocity structure and uncertainty quantification. Earth, Planets and Space, 77(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623....
 
50.
Spooner, C., Scheck-Wenderoth, M., Cacace, M., & Anikiev, D. (2022). How Alpine seismicity relates to lithospheric strength. Solid Earth Discussions, 111, 1201–1221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531....
 
51.
Sun, T., Wang, K., Iinuma, T., Hino, R., He, J., Fujimoto, H., ... & Hu, Y. (2014). Prevalence of viscoelastic relaxation after the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake. Nature, 514(7520), 84–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature....
 
52.
Tanaka, Y., Nishiyama, R., Araya, A., Sakaue, H., Nakakoji, K., Takata, T., ... & Sawada, A. (2025). A possibility of fluid migration due to the 2023 M6. 5 Noto Peninsula earthquake suggested from precise gravity measurements. Earth, Planets and Space, 77(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623....
 
53.
Taroni, M. (2025). The Gutenberg–Richter law strikes back: the exponentiality of magnitudes is confirmed by worldwide seismicity. Geophysical Journal International, 243(2), ggaf366. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/gg....
 
54.
Teng, J., Deng, Y., Badal, J., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Moho depth, seismicity and seismogenic structure in China mainland. Tectonophysics, 627, 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tect....
 
55.
Thornton, S. (2023). Karl Popper. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved April 16, 2026, from https://plato.stanford.edu/ent....
 
56.
Toda, S., Lin, J., & Stein, R. S. (2011). Using the 2011 M w 9.0 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake to test the Coulomb stress triggering hypothesis and to calculate faults brought closer to failure. Earth, Planets and Space, 63(7), 725–730. https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.20....
 
57.
Tong, F., Lasocki, S., & Orlecka-Sikora, B. (2025). Nonparametric kernel density estimation of magnitude distribution for the analysis of seismic hazard posed by anthropogenic seismicity. Acta Geophysica, 74(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600....
 
58.
Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley. 688 p. https://web.archive.org/web/20....
 
59.
Utsu, T. (1957). Magnitude of earthquakes and occurrence of their aftershocks. Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan, 2(10), 35–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.4294/zisi....
 
60.
Zaccagnino, D., Vallianatos, F., Michas, G., Telesca, L., & Doglioni, C. (2024). Are foreshocks fore‐shocks?. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 129(2), e2023JB027337. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JB....
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top